Ryan Nichols

Public January 6 profile · ready to claim

Brian Christopher Mock

Pardoned January 6 defendant

Archive identity card for Brian Christopher Mock; verified portrait not yet availableArchive card · not a photograph
A verified, rights-cleared likeness has not been approved for this profile yet.Suggest a verified portrait →

Brian Christopher Mock is one of the 1,571 January 6 defendants indexed in this archive — preserved from the DOJ Capitol Breach case list this site mirrored after the government scrubbed it from justice.gov. Case 21-cr-444 — U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. Charges, per the DOJ record: Civil Disorder; Assaulting, Resisting, or Impeding Certain Officers; Theft of Government Property; Entering and Remaining in a Restricted Building or Grounds; Disorderly and Disruptive Conduct in a Restricted Building or Grounds; Engaging in Physical Violence in a Restricted Building or Grounds; Disorderly Conduct in a Capitol Building; Act of Physical Violence in the Capitol Grounds or Buildings. The docket, as recorded: Arrested 6/11 and initial appearance held the same afternoon. Indicted 6/30. Arraigned 7/14 and pleaded not guilty to all counts. Superseding indictment filed 12/1/2021. On January 20, 2025, President Trump granted clemency covering the January 6 prosecutions. This profile is unclaimed. If this is you — or your family — claiming it is free, forever. Organize the record, add your documents, and tell the story where no platform can bury it. POST-PARDON FIRSTHAND SOURCE — JANUARY 16, 2026: Lara Logan TV published a 1-hour-25-minute episode of Going Rogue featuring Brian Mock. The verified publisher listing identifies discussion of his January 6 background, arrest and pretrial detention, claimed treatment in the D.C. Jail, claimed exculpatory evidence, constitutional-rights claims, prison reform, the First Step Act, and proposed accountability work. These are Mock’s attributed firsthand statements and the publisher’s chapter descriptions; they are not presented as independently established findings. The archive still needs the native media, a complete contextual transcript, and supporting court, custody, medical, or Bureau of Prisons records before converting individual allegations into factual conclusions. ## Dunn v. Austin intervention record Brian Christopher Mock and Cindy Lou Young sought to intervene in *Dunn et al. v. Austin et al.*, No. 1:25-cv-01844-DLF, litigation concerning a congressionally directed January 6 law-enforcement plaque. Their proposed papers sought broader or different memorial relief and described harms they associated with prosecution, incarceration, stigma, public history, and treatment of January 6 defendants. Those descriptions remain attributed to Mock and Young unless independently corroborated. On March 30, 2026, Judge Dabney L. Friedrich denied intervention. The court concluded that Mock and Young had not alleged a concrete and particularized injury sufficient for Article III standing and separately declined permissive intervention because the proposed relief did not share the required legal or factual basis with the original plaintiffs’ statutory plaque claim and could delay or prejudice the original litigation. The ruling addressed standing and intervention. It did not decide the truth or falsity of every broader firsthand assertion in their papers. [Read the court-opinion archive record](/case/documents/dunn-austin-intervention-opinion-2026-03-30), review the [connected timeline event](/case/events/dunn-austin-intervention-denied-2026-03-30), or [submit authenticated source material](/case/intake).

The case file

On the record

Case number
21-cr-444
Court
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
Disposition
Arrested 6/11 and initial appearance held the same afternoon. Indicted 6/30. Arraigned 7/14 and pleaded not guilty to all counts. Superseding indictment filed 12/1/2021.

Charges

  • Civil Disorder
  • Assaulting, Resisting, or Impeding Certain Officers
  • Theft of Government Property
  • Entering and Remaining in a Restricted Building or Grounds
  • Disorderly and Disruptive Conduct in a Restricted Building or Grounds
  • Engaging in Physical Violence in a Restricted Building or Grounds
  • Disorderly Conduct in a Capitol Building
  • Act of Physical Violence in the Capitol Grounds or Buildings

Public knowledge · no paywall

This profile is free for anyone to read.

Sign-in is only required to claim ownership, manage a claimed profile, or suggest a factual correction. Reading and sharing the public record never requires an account.

A free account is required for either action so submissions remain tied to a real person and can be reviewed.

1views0shares

Tap how this hits you — no signup, everyone sees the count

Connection to United States v. Nichols

Brian Christopher Mock appears in the record of United States v. Nichols through 3 shared documents on file below. The full case — timeline, people, documents — is public and free.

Walk the whole case →

Evidence on file

3 documents on file

Court1 document

Court orders, rulings, transcripts, and docket entries.

Dunn v. Austin — Opinion Denying Brian Mock and Cindy Young Intervention

ruling · Mar 30, 2026

Dunn v. Austin — Opinion Denying Brian Mock and Cindy Young Intervention

An 11-page March 30, 2026 memorandum opinion in Dunn v. Austin denied Brian Mock’s and Cindy Lou Young’s motions to intervene in litigation concerning the congressionally directed January 6 law-enforcement plaque. The ruling addressed standing and permissive intervention; it did not decide the truth or falsity of their broader firsthand claims about January 6, detention, stigma, public history, or government conduct.

Govt response1 document

Responses from DC DOC, the U.S. Marshals, and federal agencies.

News1 document

Press coverage.

Official recordserved from the court docket

video · Jan 16, 2026

Brian Mock: Going Rogue Interview on January 6 Custody and Prison Reform

Verified publisher record for Brian Mock’s January 16, 2026 appearance on Going Rogue with Lara Logan, episode 56, with a displayed runtime of 1:25:34. Publisher-supplied chapter markers identify discussion of Mock’s January 6 background, arrest and pretrial detention, claimed treatment in the D.C. Jail, claimed exculpatory evidence, constitutional-rights claims, prison reform, the First Step Act, and proposed next steps. Mock’s statements and the publisher’s descriptions are preserved as attributed claims, not independent archive findings. Native media capture, a complete transcript, and claim-level corroboration remain pending.